By Enza Ferreri

In a previous post we have reported how Dr. Stefano Scoglio, Ph.D., B.Sc., Italian 2018 Candidate Nobel Prize in Medicine came to the conclusion that it’s not sure this virus exists, and that he’s one of the increasing number of medical prestigious professionals who question the reality of the claimed “isolation” of the SARS-Cov-2 virus and the validity of the RT-PCR test supposedly able to detect it.

No Trace of This Virus at All. Found Only Type A and B Influenza Viruses

Now even more evidence emerges casting serious doubts on the existence of the novel coronavirus which is reputed to cause the alleged new disease Covid-19.

Dr. Derek Knauss, clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a Southern California laboratory, says he and his colleagues from 7 universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud.

Dr. Derek Knauss says:

I have a PhD in virology and immunology.

I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1,500 “supposed” positive COVID-19 samples collected here in Southern California.

When my lab team and I subjected the 1,500 supposedly positive Covid-19 samples to Koch’s postulates and put them under an SEM (electron microscope), we found NO Covid in all 1,500 samples. We found that all 1,500 samples were primarily Influenza A, and some Influenza B, but no cases of Covid. We did not use the [unreliable] PCR test.

When we sent the rest of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a couple of the labs at the University of California, they came up with the same result: NO COVID. They found Influenza A and B. Then we all asked the CDC for viable samples of Covid. The CDC said they can’t give them, because they don’t have those samples.

So we came to the hard conclusion through all our research and lab work that Covid-19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was only called ‘Covid,’ and most of the 225,000 deaths were from co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, pulmonary emphysema, etc.. They got the flu which further weakened their immune systems, and they died.

I still need to find one viable sample with Covid-19 to work with. We who conducted the lab test with these 1,500 samples at the 7 universities are now suing the CDC for Covid-19 fraud. The CDC still has not sent us a viable, isolated and purified sample of Covid-19. If they can’t or won’t, then I say there is no Covid-19. It’s fictional.

The four research papers describing the genome extracts of the Covid-19 virus never managed to isolate and purify the samples. All four papers describe only small pieces of RNA that are only 37 to 40 base pairs long. That is NOT a VIRUS. A viral genome normally has 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.

Now that Covid-19 is supposedly so bad everywhere, how come not one lab in the world has completely isolated and purified this virus? That’s because they never really found the virus. All they ever discovered were small pieces of RNA that were not identified as the virus anyway. So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain, just like every year. Covid-19 does not exist and is fictitious. [Emphasis added]

I want to underline all this because it’s something of momentous and shocking importance. The results of these lab tests were staggering.

Not even one single allegedly positive test was found to have SARS-CoV-2, the virus believed to be the cause of the new disease Covid-19 . There was no trace of this virus at all. Scientists found only type A and B influenza viruses.

Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), when requested to provide virus samples, admitted not to have any availability of them.

At that point, Dr. Knauss and his scientist colleagues concluded that the virus does not exist because no one has been able to bring incontrovertible evidence of its existence. They took the flu, called it “Covid-19” and created the most enormous scam in history. The public believed it and still believes it.

This could help explain why the flu has practically disappeared from the statistics collected since the beginning of the “Covid pandemic”. See the following WHO data on numbers of global influenza cases per week, from the first week of 2020.

You can check for yourself from here: https://apps.who.int/flumart/Default?ReportNo=10

This Is Consistent with Previous Findings of Other Scientists

In 2021 Samuel Eckert’s German Team and the Isolate Truth Fund offered a reward of $265,000 for any scientist who can provide incontrovertible evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated and therefore exists. They too pointed out that not even one lab in the world has yet been able to isolate this virus.

Some scientists “claim” they have, but their “isolation” is only of a sample from the human body, a “broth” of different kinds of cells, remains of viruses, bacteria, and so on. As we saw in our previous post, this is what Medicine Nobel Prize candidate Dr. Scoglio said, that the supernatant, the upper part of the patients’ centrifuged pharyngeal or bronchoalveolar fluid, an extremely complex matrix, was erroneously called “isolated virus”.

In December 2020 a team working with Canadian investigative journalist Christine Massey submitted no less than 40 Public Access Law requests to medical authorities worldwide simply asking for evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, which is the basis on which its existence can be objectively proven. Not one of the authorities requested was able to provide that evidence.

Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Sally Fallon Morell recently published a statement on “the continuing controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus is isolated or purified. But based on the official Oxford definition of “isolation” (“the fact or condition of being isolated or secluded, a separation from other things or persons, standing alone”), common sense, the laws of logic and the rules of science dictate that any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the existence of the virus can be given.

The logical and scientific implications of this fact are that the structure and composition of something whose existence cannot be proven cannot be known, including the presence, structure and function of hypothetical spike or other proteins. The genetic sequence of something that has never been found cannot be known, nor can the “variants” (mutations) of something whose existence has not been demonstrated. It is therefore impossible to show that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.

Combined PCR test for corona and influenza ‘because there’s hardly any difference’
Not surprisingly, the world’s largest biotech company, China’s BGI, recently launched a new PCR test that can simultaneously test for influenza A, B and corona. Apart from the proven fact, acknowledged trough various lawsuits, that a PCR test cannot prove infection with any virus whatsoever, BGI’s explanation that both diseases are so difficult to distinguish from each other and that they have therefore made only one test, says more than enough. Maybe there IS no difference at all, ‘Covid’ is just another name for ‘old familiar’ flu viruses, and this is just another clever marketing trick?[Emphasis added]

Conclusion

I must admit that at the beginning of this declared pandemic I also was persuaded of its truthfulness by the hammering, continuous propaganda.

It all seemed very strange, unheard of. There’s never been a worldwide imprisonment of entire innocent healthy populations in human history before. It seemed enormous. The reaction made it look like the bubonic plague had returned, except that the current extreme measures had not been taken even in the presence of much more deadly and severe epidemics.

So, some doubts lingered in my mind but I wanted to give, probably naively, the powers-that-be the benefit of the doubt.

Then, bit by bit, many pieces of this puzzle didn’t seem to fit. Explanations from politicians, their medical “experts” and the media started to be contradictory, refuting what they had said before but without acknowledging a mistake or a reason for changing tune. Their declarations and predictions from epidemiological models adopted the constant habit of being contradicted by events and evidence.

Now, I think that we’ve got to the point at which the probability that the dominant discourse is the truth has shown itself to be low and to get lower by the day.

 

 
THANKS TO Maurizio Blondet
AND Great Reject
PHOTO CREDIT
Photo by Edwin Hooper on Unsplash