By Enza Ferreri
The doubts about the real, scientifically verified existence of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus believed to be responsible for a new pandemic, and not just seasonal flu, are growing, as we’ve shown on this website.
In previous posts, we’ve reported on medical doctors and scientists who have questioned the reality of the claimed “isolation” of the new virus which would provide the proof of its existence, and doubted the validity of the RT-PCR test supposedly able to detect it.
First we described why Dr. Stefano Scoglio, Ph.D., B.Sc., Italian 2018 Candidate Nobel Prize in Medicine, came to the conclusion that it’s not sure this virus exists, and explained how he discovered that.
Then we discussed Dr. Derek Knauss, clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a Southern California laboratory, who declared that he and other scientists from 7 universities are suing the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for massive fraud. The reason is that, after subjecting 1,500 supposedly positive Covid-19 samples to Koch’s postulates and putting them under an SEM (electron microscope) rather than using the unreliable PCR test, these researchers found not even one case of Covid-19 virus in any of the 1,500 samples, but only Influenza A and Influenza B viruses.
A Reward of 1.5 Million Euros for Whoever Offers Proof of Isolation and therefore Existence of New Coronavirus Still Waiting
In Germany, Samuel Eckert, who describes himself as a Christian, and the BBC describes as “a former evangelical preacher, who runs a public Telegram channel with more than 120,000 subscribers”, has launched an unusual challenge and bet.
His group’s website Isolate Truth Fund declares:
1.5 million € for a virologist who presents scientific proof of the existence of a corona virus, including documented control attempts of all steps taken in the proof.
The website also explains the reasons behind the offer:
All virologists, not just those pictured, have deceived themselves and the public when they claim the existence of disease-causing viruses such as SARS-CoV-2.
Virologists inadvertently kill cells in test tubes, believing that this is proof of the presence and isolation of a virus. Only from fragments of dying cells do virologists mentally construct a gene sequence and pass it off as fact. Therefore, the test procedures do not offer any significance or meaning. Typical structures of dying cells in the electron microscope are passed off as viruses. Such structures could never be detected or recognized in a human being so far!
So far, no-one has been able to win Samuel Eckert’s challenge.
Where Is the Virus?
The claims that the novel coronavirus has been isolated are very shaky, and even the highly reputable and internationally prestigious British Medical Journal has published a letter, entitled “Re: Covid-19: Where is the virus?”, which I’m reproducing in full:
We are told that the virus is everywhere – in the air, in our breath, on fomites, trapped in masks – yet public health authorities seem not to be in possession of any cultivable clinical samples of the offending pathogen.
In March 2020, the World Health Organisation instructed authorities not to look for a virus but to rely instead on a genome test, the RT-PCR, which is not specific for SARS-CoV-2 (1) (2).
A Freedom of Information request to Public Health England about cultivable clinical samples or direct evidence of viral isolation has no information and refers to the proxy RT-PCR test, quoting Eurosurveillance (3).
Eurosurveillance states: “Virus detection by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) from respiratory samples is widely used to diagnose and monitor SARS-CoV-2 infection and, increasingly, to infer infectivity of an individual. However, RT-PCR does not distinguish between infectious and non-infectious virus. Propagating virus from clinical samples confirms the presence of infectious virus but is not widely available (and) requires biosafety level 3 facilities” (4).
The CDC admits that, “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available”, and used a genetically modified human lung alveolar adenocarcinoma cell culture to, “mimic clinical specimen”(5).
It appears, therefore, that we have public health bodies without clinical samples, a test which is non-specific and does not distinguish between infectivity and non-infectivity, a requirement for biosafety level 3 facilities to even look for a virus, yet we are led to believe that it is up all our noses.
So, where is the virus? [All emphasis added]